If I wanted to hire or recommend this person to a future position, this letter created a roadblock. It said, “I resigned peacefully,” and, “Unfortunately, (former employer) has decided to assassinate my professional character.” Not so peacefully, then. Star employees address conflicts objectively and recognize that no assassination is peaceful. A potential employer would question his ability to read people and situations accurately.
The writer attached his resignation letter, which included a laundry list of slights, slammed the former employer and included threats of lawsuits. Why is he sharing this information indiscriminately? How can anyone hire or recommend a tattletale?
His letter reveals more than he might realize, saying, “While I made some errors in judgment over the past few weeks, they did not rise to the level that was indicated… not just my opinion, but also the opinion of several attorneys and agencies… who, unlike executive management, were able to make an unbiased decision… abused by your company… taking measures to remedy the situation.” Maybe it’s PTSD from raising children, but the whine in his voice hurts my ears, and I’m sitting in another state, unattached, just reading the thing.
Like most potential employers, not knowing the guy, I have only this letter to go by when assessing this person’s character and abilities. He may be talented and wise, but his “errors in judgment” extend beyond any reasonable level. By sending this letter to his entire network and theirs, this individual comes across like a firecracker on the Fourth of July: explosive, far-reaching and aimless about where he lands.
If this is someone you want in the desk next to yours, on the assembly line near you or as your next trainee, let me know. He is probably available to start soon.