Facing the possibility of losing a significant source of revenue, banks are pulling out all the stops to make sure the bill never becomes law. Lenders have spent millions of dollars in recent months holding public town-hall meetings and private meetings with legislators to make their case. Using scare tactics, they are telling lawmakers that students may default on their student loans more frequently because the counseling lenders provide would no longer be a part of the loan process. The banks say that, in the long run students and the government would be hurt if the bill was passed.
It’s interesting how these major banks - bailed out to the tune of over $700 billion in 2009 - are now, in effect bailing out on the nation’s students. Cutting out these middle man, which the banks are, does not hurt students at all. In fact, getting the money directly will reduce the amount of interest students pay over the life of the loan. Students, and the nation, will benefit as educational programs are expanded, using the savings such a change will bring. This is about money, plain and simple: lenders want to make sure this revenue stream stays alive.
Banks are in business to preserve their bottom line; not necessarily to care about the education of our student’s. As a nation, we must work to make sure their big budget lobbying efforts do not pay off. Call your federal lawmakers and let them know that federal student loans must go directly students. Ask that they cut out the middle man. The banks may have money to spend on lobbying, but we can use our voices to make a difference. You can find contact information for you legislators by visiting http://www.usa.gov/Contact/Elected.shtml.
Judge Greg Mathis became the youngest judge in Michigan’s history and was elected a Superior Court Judge for Michigan’s 36th District. He has been called upon as a regular contributor to national television programs, including “Larry King Live,” “Politically Incorrect,” CNN's "Talk Back Live,” “Showbiz Tonight” and “Extra” to discuss his opinions on complex issues of the day, such as national security, unique sentencing, affirmative action and celebrity scandals. He also offers his take on high-profile legal cases.